Uh oh.

https://www.cruiselawnews.com/2021/08/articles/disease/carnival-cruise-line-admits-positive-covid-19-cases-aboard-carnival-vista-but-refuses-to-state-number-of-guests-infected/

Last night, the Galveston Daily News reported that the Carnival Vista had a number of positive COVID-19 cases aboard the cruise ship which sailed from Galveston, Texas. However, Carnival Cruise Line refused to state the exact number of infected guests, admitting only that a “small number of people” on board tested positive.

So what is the big deal?

Well, every soul on board has their proof of “vaccination”.

As I mentioned previously in June, this is ENTIRELY expected. The CDC has finally admitted that the vaccine has no use in stopping transmission. That is just short of admitting it never did, which I heavily suspected based on every single other coronavirus “vaccine” ever made not to mention their own literature.

The point is, this is an admission that these “jabs” are not actually “vaccines” as has been reported extensively but rather, they are prophylactics, which anyone who has bothered to look at the literature already knows.

As that is the case, as admitted by the CDC and now proven by the carnival cruise and other places, then now what “the science” says, undisputed, the world just did the absolute worst thing it could do by giving it out to everyone they could.

Again, I would like to say, it was already known and published, that these “vaccines” did not stop transmission. Only now is it being publically admitted though. We have all seen the propaganda that says otherwise, despite the massive amount of revisionist history currently going on to erase it.

If these “vaccines” should be used period, is up for debate, what isn’t, any prophylactic injection should by definition only be used on those at the highest risk, this is because it gives the virus a stable environment in which to mutate. With that danger, such medical measures should only be weighed against the risk of death.

THEY KNEW THIS IN JANUARY. I did too, as well as anyone else who read the reports on the “vaccine”.

They knew this, minimum, 15 years ago, as a scientific fact when the sars cov 1 vaccine rolled out and killed the people who took it from Antibody-Dependent Enhancement.

They knew this over 70 years ago with the polio vaccine.

It seems, almost daily now the worst-case scenario is unfolding, while simultaneously, being ignored and even ridiculed by the media, government, and the rabid covid-cult followers.

How dare anyone say that this is a disease of the “unvaccinated” when one, it isn’t a vaccine, as the CDC just admitted, and two… If you look at the most “vaccinated” populations on earth, they are the ones with the high death rates currently. This is quickly looking like the same ADE reactions, that every other covid “vaccine” ever created has had as a defect. In this case, was it a feature? Do you trust these assholes?

This was already known years ago. This is common knowledge, So why? They all knew this was going to happen. Did they ignore it from fear? Or was something more sinister at play? Does it seem odd every country on Earth got “locked down and masked up” despite ZERO science supporting that as a measure against respiratory infection?

Is it odd to you, that every country on Earth is simultaneously telling us that you must get an injection while also telling us that the injections can’t stop transmission while also telling us that the only reason covid persists is because of the “unvaccinated”.

Have you noticed that even? We have conflicting propaganda ATM… maybe you can wake up as the authorities give you two different messages?

Hard not to see this as an agenda when the lies and censorship continue. This has never been about a virus. There is no virus.

Just for fun, next time you see some random covid propaganda, do a lil ol copy/paste/search

This is simple. This is an agenda. Bots and censorship are not needed for truth to spread. Only lies.

and more comes rolling in…

https://archive.ph/9Sow9

The CDC has known it to be true that covid injections quite literally do nothing since day one. At most, maybe they make your symptoms less severe if you were to get covid, at one point. Maybe.

Obviously, this is something that can never be proven. How could that ever be proven? Please, let me know. They do say it constantly.

Clearly now, it is well known, proved beyond any reasonable doubt, this is a disease of the vaccinated, as explained above and in the article I wrote predicting this all from JUNE.

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID‐19 vaccines worsening clinical disease

COVID‐19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID‐19 disease via antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications

The specific and significant COVID‐19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

lets drive it home here…

CONCLUSION

Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non‐theoretical and compelling risk for COVID‐19 vaccines and the “laundry list” nature of informed consents, disclosure of the specific risk of worsened COVID‐19 disease from vaccination calls for a specific, separate, informed consent form and demonstration of patient comprehension in order to meet medical ethics standards. The informed consent process for ongoing COVID‐19 vaccine trials does not appear to meet this standard. 

Update 8/11/21

I am finding it hard to find any valid information that discounts my above-stated fear.

Many countries listed as a high travel risk by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have enforced vaccine compliance the best according to data from the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) School of Medicine.

The nations of Malta, the United Arab Emirates, Seychelles, Uruguay, Chile, Bahrain, Mongolia, Israel and Ireland are on the CDC’s list of Level 4 countries for COVID-19 risk. This is despite all of these countries vaccinating well over 50 percent of their population, with countries listed reaching as high as 78.8 percent compliance.

The data compiled by JHU omits Gibraltar, which also appears as a Level 4 country by the CDC. Gibraltar has boasted 99 percent rates of vaccine compliance, the highest of any country in the world, which has corresponded with a recent case spike and a renewal of crippling lockdown policies.

Update 8/10/21

Curious… The obvious objections aside, this is simply curious huh?

REFERENCES

1. Huisman W, Martina BE, Rimmelzwaan GF, Gruters RA, Osterhaus AD. Vaccine‐induced enhancement of viral infections. Vaccine. 2009;27:505‐512. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Boyoglu‐Barnum S, Chirkova T, Anderson LJ. Biology of infection and disease pathogenesis to guide RSV vaccine development. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1675. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Chen WH, Hotez PJ, Bottazzi ME. Potential for developing a SARS‐CoV receptor‐binding domain (RBD) recombinant protein as a heterologous human vaccine against coronavirus infectious disease (COVID)‐19. Human Vacc Immunother. 2020;16:1239‐1242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Jiang S, He Y, Liu S. SARS vaccine development. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1016‐1020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Tseng CT, Sbrana E, Iwata‐Yoshikawa N, et al. Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35421. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Wang Q, Zhang L, Kuwahara K, et al. Immunodominant SARS coronavirus epitopes in humans elicited both enhancing and neutralizing effects on infection in non‐human primates. ACS Infect Dis. 2016;2:361‐376. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Yang JK, Lin SS, Ji XJ, Guo LM. Binding of SARS coronavirus to its receptor damages islets and causes acute diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2010;47:193‐199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Liu L, Wei Q, Lin Q, et al. Anti‐spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS‐CoV infection. JCI insight. 2019;4:e123158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Liu ZL, Liu Y, Wan LG, et al. Antibody profiles in mild and severe cases of COVID‐19. Clin Chem. 2020;66:1102–1104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Piccoli L, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, et al. Mapping neutralizing and immunodominant sites on the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike receptor‐binding domain by structure‐guided high‐resolution serology. Cell. 2020;S0092‐8674:31234‐4 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Robbiani DF, Gaebler C, Muecksch F, et al. Convergent antibody responses to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in convalescent individuals. bioRxiv. 2020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Yong CY, Ong HK, Yeap SK, Ho KL, Tan WS. Recent advances in the vaccine development against middle east respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1781. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Corbett KS, Flynn B, Foulds KE, et al. Evaluation of the mRNA‐1273 Vaccine against SARS‐CoV‐2 in Nonhuman Primates. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1544–1555. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Mulligan MJ, Lyke KE, Kitchin N, et al. Phase 1/2 study of COVID‐19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature. 2020;586:589–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Becerra‐Flores M, Cardozo T. SARS‐CoV‐2 viral spike G614 mutation exhibits higher case fatality rate. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74:e13525. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, et al. Tracking changes in SARS‐CoV‐2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID‐19 virus. Cell. 2020;182:812‐827.e819. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Mansbach RA, Chakraborty S, Nguyen K, Montefiori D, Korber B, Gnanakaran S. The SARS‐CoV‐2 spike variant D614G favors an open conformational state. bioRxiv. 2020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Zhang L, Jackson C, Mou H, et al. The D614G mutation in the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein reduces S1 shedding and increases infectivity. bioRxiv. 2020. [Google Scholar]

19. Wendler D. What should be disclosed to research participants? Am J Bioeth. 2013;13:3‐8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. McNamara D.Three Major COVID Vaccine Developers Release Detailed Trial Protocols. https://wwwmedscapecom/viewarticle/937845; 2020.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

twelve + 14 =